Lipoprotein apheresis is an optimal therapeutic option to reduce increased Lp(a) levels.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a genetic risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is associated with the induction and sustaining of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). Since 2008 Lp(a) along with progressive CVD has been approved as an indication for regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in Germany. The German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (GLAR) has been initiated to provide statistical evidence for the assessment of extracorporeal procedures to treat dyslipidemia for both LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and Lp(a). The GLAR now allows prospective investigations over a 5-year period about annual incidence rates of cardiovascular events. Here Lp(a) patients (LDL-C < 100 mg/dl; Lp(a) > 60 mg/dl or >120 nmol/l) showed the same reduction of major coronary (83%) and non-coronary events (63%) as had been formerly shown in the Pro(a)LiFe study. However, Lp(a) is not only an apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) and LDL-C containing particle, which is covalently bound to a LDL-C core by a disulphide bridge. The composition of this particle, inter alia containing oxidized phospholipids, gives pro-atherosclerotic, pro-inflammatory, and pro-thrombotic properties, inducing atherosclerotic processes mainly in the arterial wall. However, recent investigations have shown that a reduction of inflammatory settings without LDL-C or Lp(a) reduction may reduce ASCVD events. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) could not only reduce LDL-C and Lp(a) in parallel, but also different inflammatory and coagulation parameters. In summary lipoprotein apheresis is not only anti-atherosclerotic, but also anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic and therefore an ideal treatment option with respect to the shown reduction of major adverse coronary events (MACE) and major adverse non-coronary events (MANCE) by reducing Lp(a) levels.

[Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and C3 glomerulopathy]. / Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis und C3­Glomerulopathie.

Based on an increasingly better pathophysiological understanding over the last 10 years, in 2010 a new classification of glomerulonephritis with dominant or codominant C3 deposits was introduced and the predominant subgoup was termed C3 glomerulopathy (C3G). In the current classification, immune complex mediated membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) and C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) form a disease spectrum which is very heterogeneous in terms of pathophysiology and the clinical course. Recent evidence suggests that IC-MPGN and C3G share more pathophysiological aspects with respect to secondary causes, autoantibodies and genetic aspects than had been suggested with the creation of the new classification. Knowledge of the underlying pathophysiology is important for guiding the diagnostic steps for clarification of secondary causes. Comprehensive complement analysis, accompanied by antibody screening and genetic analysis, should be consistently carried out. Although not systematically validated in clinical trials, the published evidence provides a robust foundation for the use of available treatment approaches for these diseases that are often rapidly progressive and often return after renal transplantation.

Treatment-related and health-related quality of life in lipoprotein apheresis patients.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence for beneficial effects of lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in terms of reduction of cardiovascular events and interventions, but quality of life (QOL) in LA patients has only been explored in small samples. OBJECTIVE: In this study, both LA- or treatment-related and health-related QOL (HRQOL) were assessed in 206 LA patients. METHODS: Mental and physical HRQOL of the LA patients was assessed by means of the SF-12 as well as the EQ-5D. Physical complaints were assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and LA- or treatment-related QOL by the Apheresis Quality of Life Form, developed for this study. RESULTS: Comparison with general population norms showed that LA patients scored significantly lower on HRQOL and significantly higher on physical complaints. A higher perceived impact of the treatment proved to have a significant negative association with HRQOL and a positive one with physical complaints. CONCLUSION: Previous studies reported higher levels of QOL in LA patients. This study showed that treatment-related QOL contributes to HRQOL and physical complaints in LA patients. While many patients do not experience LA as a real burden and report positive effects of the treatment, there is also an important group of patients for whom this is not the case. Although the impact on QOL of LA patients does most probably not outweigh the cardiovascular benefits of the treatment, it is important to screen treatment-related QOL in LA patients to optimize care in a personalized way. Future research is needed to compare QOL in LA with non-LA patients with similar medical conditions.

Lipoprotein apheresis influences monocyte subpopulations.

BACKGROUND: Monocytes can be differentiated into subpopulations depending on their expression profile of CD14 and CD16. CD16-positive monocytes are associated with coronary artery disease. Up to now, no data exist about the effect of lipoprotein apheresis (LA) on the distribution of monocyte subpopulations. METHODS: 80 patients who underwent LA at the University Hospital Dresden were included in the study. 8 out of the 80 LA patients received LA for the first time at the time point of blood analysis. Six different methods of LA were used (H.E.L.P. n = 8; Liposorber D n = 10; LF n = 14; DALI n = 17; MONET n = 11; Therasorb® LDL n = 12). Blood samples were taken immediately before and after LA and analyzed for CD14 and CD16 expression on monocytes. A total of 42 patients with cardiovascular risk factors but no indication for LA served as control group. RESULTS: The composition of monocyte-population was analyzed in regard to the 3 subpopulations. After LA, an increase in classical monocytes (CD14++CD16-) (93.3% vs. 93.9%, p < 0.01) and a decrease in non-classical monocytes (CD14+CD16+) (1.5% vs 1.0%; p < 0.001) were observed. LA did not change the amount of intermediate monocytes (CD14++CD16+) (5.3% vs. 5.1%). Two methods (MONET and Therasorb® LDL) did not influence the distribution of monocyte subpopulations. Interestingly, patients with LDL-C above 2.5 mmol/l prior LA showed increased amounts of intermediate monocytes. CONCLUSION: The distribution of monocyte populations is influenced by LA but depends on the distinct method of LA. Influences of LA were mainly observed in the content of classical and non-classical monocytes, whereas the intermediate monocyte population remained unaltered by LA.

Kinetics of Lipoprotein(a) in patients undergoing weekly lipoprotein apheresis for Lp(a) hyperlipoproteinemia.

INTRODUCTION: Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) represents the only effective therapeutic option for patients with elevated Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels. We aimed at analyzing the Lp(a) reduction, rebound rates as well as mean interval values between two weekly apheresis sessions, since this might be important for the prediction of the residual cardiovascular risk and development of individualized approaches for this special therapeutic strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 patients under weekly and 2 patients under twice weekly apheresis were included. We measured serum concentrations of Lp(a), total, LDL-, HDL - cholesterol and triglycerides daily over 7 days after single LA sessions. RESULTS: Mean Lp(a) levels was 158.1 ± 69.82 nmol/l before the LA session, decreased acutely by 76 ± 7% and increased to 97 ± 13% of the baseline value within 7 days in patients under weekly treatment. By mathematical modeling, the acute Lp(a) reduction can be calculated from the function: y (nmol/l) = 3.415 + 0.738 * x (R2 = 0.970), where x is the baseline Lp(a) value. The recovery rate can be predicted from the equation: y (%) = 22.49 + 18.64 * x - 1.14 * x2 (R2 = 0.874), where x is the day after apheresis. The empirical formula for the mean interval value is: y (nmol/l) = x - 12, where x is the absolute reduction in nmol/l. CONCLUSION: We modeled - for the first time - equations to predict the course of Lp(a) serum levels under weekly LA which are simple, reliable and enable the development of optimal individualized protocols of this costly lipid lowering therapy.

Dysregulation of the CD4+ T cells lineage differentiation in dyslipidemic patients and impact of lipoprotein-apheresis treatment: A case study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Lipoprotein-apheresis (LA) is a therapeutic approach used against severe forms of dyslipidemia in patients who are non-responders or intolerant to pharmacological treatments. However, little is known about the potential pleiotropic effects of LA, particularly regarding the immune system and its regulation. Thus, in an attempt to analyse the potential effects of dyslipidemia and LA on the regulation of CD4+ T cells activation and lineage differentiation, we compared the CD4+ T cells cytokines secretion profiles of dyslipidemic patients before and after LA with the profiles observed in healthy donors. METHODS: CD4+ T cells were isolated from 5 LA patients and 5 healthy donors and activated with anti-CD3 or anti-CD3 + anti-CD46 antibodies. The supernatants were collected after 36 h incubation and levels of secreted cytokines analysed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Our results revealed a deep remodelling of CD4+ T cells cytokines secretion patterns in dyslipidemic patients compared to healthy donors, as reflected by a 15 times higher IFN-γ secretion rate after CD3 + CD46 co-activation in dyslipidemic patients after LA compared to healthy subjects and 8 times higher after CD3 activation alone (p = 0.0187 and p = 0.0118 respectively). Moreover, we demonstrated that LA itself also modifies the phenotype and activation pattern of CD4+ T-cells in dyslipidemic patients. CONCLUSION: These observations could be of fundamental importance in the improvement of LA columns/systems engineering and in developing new therapeutic approaches regarding dyslipidemia and associated pathologies such as atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes.

Most significant reduction of cardiovascular events in patients undergoing lipoproteinapheresis due to raised Lp(a) levels - A multicenter observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent cardiovascular (CV) risk factor, predisposing to premature and progressive CV events. Lipoproteinapheresis (LA) is the only efficacious therapy for reducing Lp(a). Data comparing the clinical efficacy of LA with respect to reduction of CV events in subjects with elevated Lp(a) versus LDL-C versus both disorders is scarce. We aimed to perform this comparison in a multicenter observational study. METHODS: 113 LA patients from 8 apheresis centers were included (mean age 56.3 years). They were divided into 3 groups: Group I: Lp(a) < 600 mg/l, LDL-C > 2.6 mmol/l, Group II: Lp(a) > 600 mg/l, LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/l, and Group III: Lp(a) > 600 mg/l, LDL-C > 2.6 mmol/l. CV events were documented 2 years before versus 2 years after LA start. RESULTS: Before start of LA Group II showed the highest CV event rate (p 0.001). Group III had a higher CV event rate than Group I (p 0.03). During LA there was a significant reduction of CV events/patient in all vessel beds (1.22 ± 1.16 versus 0.33 ± 0.75, p < 0.001). The highest CV event rate during LA was seen in coronaries followed by peripheral arteries, cerebrovascular events were least common. Greater CV event reduction rates were achieved in patients with isolated Lp(a) elevation (-77%, p < 0.001) and in patients with Lp(a) and LDL-C elevation (-74%, p < 0.001) than in subjects with isolated hypercholesterolemia (-53%, p 0.06). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that patients with Lp(a) elevation benefit most from LA treatment. Prospective trials to confirm these data are warranted.

Comparing the efficacy of three techniques to reduce isoagglutinin titers in AB0 incompatible kidney transplant recipients.

ABO incompatible (ABOi) organ transplantation requires pre-transplant reduction of the recipient's IgG and IgM isoagglutinin titer against the donor to prevent hyperacute rejection. Over the past four years we primarily used unspecific IgG immunoadsorption (IA) for this purpose and combined this selectively with membrane filtration (IAc) to reduce IgM isoagglutinines. In patients with an initial IgG titer against donor below 1:64, plasma exchange (PE) was initiated. In this retrospective analysis covering January 2012 to August 2015 we compared how efficiently IgG and IgM isoagglutinines in a total of 22 ABOi kidney transplant recipients were reduced by either IA (n = 75 sessions), IAc (n = 14 sessions) or PE (n = 40 sessions). Median pre-treatment IgG isoagglutinin titers were 32 (4-4096) while IgM titers were 16 (1-256) respectively. Mean IgG reduction by either treatment modality was 1.3 ± 0.9 (IA), 1.8 ± 1.0 (IAc) and 2.6 ± 1.3 (PE) titer steps per session (p < 0.001 IA vs. PE; p < 0.04 PE vs. IAc). Mean IgM reduction was 0.6 ± 0.6 (IA), 1.8 ± 0.8 (IAc) and 2.4 ± 1.9 (PE) titer steps (p < 0.001 for both IA vs. PE and IA vs. IAc). Our data indicate that PE efficiently removed IgG- and IgM isoagglutinines. By processing only half the plasma volume per treatment PE was twice as effective as IA in terms of IgG-type isoagglutinin removal in our patient group. This is best explained by the presence of soluble AB0 antigens in the FFP used as plasma replacement. These advantages in efficacy have to be weighed against the potential hazards of PE. Combination of IA and plasma filtration effectively removes IgM-type and even enhances net IgG-type isoagglutinin elimination compared to IA alone. When trying to avoid PE, combined application of IA and IAc is a possible and effective way to reduce isoagglutinin titers before ABOi transplantation.

Monitoring of complement activation biomarkers and eculizumab in complement-mediated renal disorders.

Various complement-mediated renal disorders are treated currently with the complement inhibitor eculizumab. By blocking the cleavage of C5, this monoclonal antibody prevents cell damage caused by complement-mediated inflammation. We included 23 patients with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS, n = 12), C3 glomerulopathies (C3G, n = 9) and acute antibody-mediated renal graft rejection (AMR, n = 2), treated with eculizumab in 12 hospitals in Germany. We explored the course of complement activation biomarkers and the benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring of eculizumab. Complement activation was assessed by analysing the haemolytic complement function of the classical (CH50) and the alternative pathway (APH50), C3 and the activation products C3d, C5a and sC5b-9 prior to, 3 and 6 months after eculizumab treatment. Eculizumab concentrations were determined by a newly established specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Serum eculizumab concentrations up to 1082 µg/ml point to drug accumulation, especially in paediatric patients. Loss of the therapeutic antibody via urine with concentrations up to 56 µg/ml correlated with proteinuria. In aHUS patients, effective complement inhibition was demonstrated by significant reductions of CH50, APH50, C3d and sC5b-9 levels, whereas C5a levels were only reduced significantly after 6 months' treatment. C3G patients presented increased C3d and consistently low C3 levels, reflecting ongoing complement activation and consumption at the C3 level, despite eculizumab treatment. A comprehensive complement analysis together with drug monitoring is required to distinguish mode of complement activation and efficacy of eculizumab treatment in distinct renal disorders. Accumulation of the anti-C5 antibody points to the need for a patient-orientated tailored therapy.

Adverse events of lipoprotein apheresis and immunoadsorption at the Apheresis Center at the University Hospital Dresden.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein apheresis and immunoadsorption methods have a firm place among therapeutic approaches in order to treat disorders of lipoprotein metabolism or anti-body induced diseases. The extracorporeal treatment is associated with adverse effects, we wanted to report the Dresden experience. METHODS: In this study we retrospectively analyzed the adverse events of several lipoprotein apheresis and immunoadsorption methods at the Apheresis Center in Dresden (Germany). We carefully looked into all available documents. The first extracorporeal lipoprotein apheresis was performed in 1990 and the first extracorporeal immunoadsorption was executed in 1995. Throughout the 23 years study period, 10 different methods were employed in treating 268 patients for a total of 25,293 treatments. RESULTS: Adverse events of varying severity occurred in 1948 of the treatments (7.7%). We subdivided them into mild (61.3% no treatment was necessary), moderate (37.0% oral medication or infusion was given) and severe (1.7% emergency hospitalization was necessary). Therapy had to be stopped prematurely in 1.5% of the treatments. We compared adverse events profiles among the different methods and evaluated for differences by gender. Females were found to have a significantly higher risk of adverse events than male patients. In males, the rate of adverse events ranged from 3.3% (Liposorber(®) D) to 11% (Therasorb™ Ig); in females the minimum rate was 7.8% (DALI) and the maximum 30% (rheopheresis). Adverse events were evenly distributed between the ages of 30-69, the age range at which most of the therapies were performed. We also found that all methods had a higher rate of adverse events during the first year of treatment. Puncture problems and hypotension were the most common adverse events. CONCLUSION: It can be stressed that in general the extracorporeal methods used can be regarded as safe.

Effects of different lipoprotein apheresis methods on serum protein levels.

BACKGROUND: A total plasma exchange was the first extracorporeal method to treat patients with severe hypercholesterolemia. But in the long run it has several disadvantages. The newer lipoprotein apheresis (LA) methods claim to be more selective with respect to the removal of atherogenic lipoproteins and thus are supposed to avoid an additional protein loss. METHODS: We wanted to compare the effect of these methods on serum protein concentrations (total serum protein, albumin, proteins measured with electrophoresis, immunoglobulins, fibrinogen, transferrin, and ferritin) which were checked before and after a single LA session in 75 patients. All patients underwent active LA treatment using 6 different LA methods (HELP, TheraSorb(®) LDL, DALI, Lipidfiltration, Liposorber D, MONET). Post-apheresis concentrations were corrected for changes in hematocrit. RESULTS: The slightest impact on total serum protein was observed with the whole-blood methods. Liposorber D showed the least reduction of albumin levels. All LA methods had a small effect on alpha1-globulins and beta-globulins, but alpha2-and gamma-globulins were reduced to a different extent. A major effect was seen on the immunoglobulins when filtration methods were applied. In the patients treated with MONET, both pre- and post-apheresis Immunoglobulin M concentrations were below the normal range. HELP and the filtration methods significantly reduced the fibrinogen concentrations. The filtration methods also decreased ferritin levels but the post-apheresis ferritin levels were still in the normal range. CONCLUSION: All LA methods had an influence on protein concentrations. At present, these findings will not yield an individualized treatment approach for any selective LA method due to the lack of prospective comparative studies. At minimum, special attention should be paid to protein concentrations in patients suffering from protein deficit.

Actual situation of lipoprotein apheresis in Saxony in 2013.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is an officially accepted therapeutic approach in Germany. Reliable population-based data on the patients are scarce. It is of special interest to learn what are the main indications for this extracorporeal treatment and how many new patients started over the last years. METHODS: This paper is a summary of the situation of the treatment of high-risk patients via LA in the federal state of Saxony, Germany. The documentation of all patients who agreed to be included into this study have been evaluated. Patients were treated at the University Hospital Dresden (UHD) and in private practices of nephrologists. This evaluation aimed at the characterization of patients treated with LA in Saxony with respect to age, gender, lipid pattern, to the number of new patients per year and the development of the ratio of patients to the Saxon population between 2010 and 2013. The obtained data were compared with the official statistics published by the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians for whole Germany. RESULTS: In 2013, 181 patients, primarily males, were treated in 15 LA centers by 32 doctors. Still, the number of apheresis doctors per 1 million inhabitants is under the average in Germany (Saxony: 7.7/1 million inhabitants, average: 12/1 million inhabitants). The usage of LA is 45 per 1 million inhabitants in Saxony; in comparison to 2010, this is an increase of 16 per 1 million inhabitants. The number of new patients in 2013 with an isolated elevation of Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is twice as high than it was in 2011. The mean duration of all patients being treated with LA, most on a weekly basis, was 5.75 years (UHD: 6.2 years, range: 1 month to 23.1 years; other centers: 5.3 years, range: 1 month to 19.2 years). About 19.3% of all patients suffered from elevated triglyceride (TG) levels (>5 mmol/L). Non-high- density lipoprotein cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) was calculated, which is also acutely reduced by LA sessions. The following data were reported for those patients who are treated outside the UHD: risk factors such as hypertension and familial predisposition could be seen in almost every patient, and several others such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, genetic defects and obesity were also present. Almost all patients had suffered from cardiovascular events (CVE) occurring before the start of apheresis treatment. LA therapy led to a reduction in occurrence of CVE during LA therapy. In particular, patients with an isolated increased Lp(a) had the highest reduction when comparing CVE before and during apheresis therapy. In the official statistics published by the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians the number of LA patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is clearly too high. Moreover, these statistics do not include patients who are treated at hospitals like the UHD. CONCLUSION: All in all it can be shown that the extracorporeal therapy is performed effectively in Saxony, and that more centers than 2010 (additional 5) were conducting this therapy when lipid-lowering medication was not sufficiently effective. It is certain that the number of patients requiring LA will increase in the future.

Effects of Lipoprotein apheresis on the Lipoprotein(a) levels in the long run.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a low density lipoprotein-like particle to which apolipoprotein(a) is bound. It is recognized as an atherosclerosis-inducing risk factor. Up to now a detailed description of the effect of Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) on Lp(a) levels in the long run is lacking. METHODS: We studied 59 patients with elevated Lp(a) levels who were treated with LA at the Lipoprotein Apheresis Center at the University Hospital Dresden. We analyzed Lp(a) concentrations before the start of the LA treatment and during this extracorporeal therapy. RESULTS: Comparing the Lp(a) levels before the start of LA therapy and pre-apheresis (measured before the LA sessions) Lp(a) levels, we observed a reduction of the Lp(a) levels of about 22.8% in all patients. Lp(a) levels were acutely (comparing post-apheresis with pre-apheresis concentrations) reduced by all 6 available LA methods (by about 70%). A linear regression analysis was performed to differentiate the long term course of pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels. In 30 patients we saw an increase of the pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels over the time, in 15 patients a constancy and in 14 patients a decrease. Patients with a decrease of pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels over the time had significantly higher initial (before the start of the extracorporeal treatment) and pre-apheresis values and they were significantly older. These patients had significantly more severe peripheral arterial disease as well as cardiac valve and carotid stenosis. The patients with the lowest initial Lp(a) levels and an increase of the pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels over the time had the highest percentage of intake of Tredaptive(®)/Niaspan(®) though after stopping the intake of these nicotinic acid preparations no clear increase of Lp(a) concentrations was observed. The applied LA systems did not seem to have a significant influence on the course of pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels. In all patients there was a high variability of Lp(a) concentrations between LA sessions which may in part be due to the inaccuracy of the method used to measure Lp(a) concentrations. CONCLUSION: Pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels (before the LA sessions) are lower than those before the start of a LA treatment but they behave differently among patients during LA treatment.

Immunoadsorption for connective tissue disease.

Distinct connective tissue diseases (CTD's) such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis, mixed connective tissue disease as well as dermato- and polymyositis comprise a group of diseases, where autoantibodies are not merely indicators of autoimmune disease, but also play an relevant role in the underlying pathogenicity. This knowledge led to the development of antibody targeting therapies using rituximab or belimumab. Upon this, therapeutic plasma exchange, and more recently immunoadsorption (IAS) have been successfully applied to remove pathogenic autoantibodies under various conditions in some of these CTD's. While the technique of IAS is superior to plasma exchange in regard to specificity and efficacy, the clinical use of IAS in CTD's is currently restricted to a small proportion of clinical situations with either refractory disease or the necessity to avoid aggressive immunosuppressive regimens. Despite the presence of a large number of case series and few controlled trials using IAS, there is a need for further prospective randomized trials to clearly define the role of IAS in these CTD's.

Local VEGF activity but not VEGF expression is tightly regulated during diabetic nephropathy in man.

Several studies have implicated the angiogenic cytokine vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the development of diabetic nephropathy, but no data are available about its local activity during human disease. Glomeruli from 52 archival biopsies from type II diabetics were evaluated and compared to 10 renal biopsies without kidney disease (controls). Glomerulosclerosis, capillary rarefaction, glomerular and endothelial cell proliferation, apoptosis, VEGF expression, as well as receptor-bound VEGF indicating local VEGF activity, and phosphorylation of the signal transduction molecule Akt were investigated. Owing to substantial heterogeneity of glomerular lesions in individual biopsies, these parameters were correlated with the degree of injury in individual glomeruli rather than biopsies. Severe glomerular capillary rarefaction was linked to the degree of glomerulosclerosis. While cellular apoptosis was detected independent of the stage of injury, endothelial cell proliferation indicating capillary repair was markedly increased only in mildly/moderately injured glomeruli. In controls, VEGF was predominantly expressed in podocytes, whereas receptor-bound VEGF was confined to the glomerular endothelium. VEGF expression was increased in all diabetic glomeruli by many different cell types. In contrast, VEGF receptor activation was increased predominantly in the endothelium of only mildly injured glomeruli, but significantly decreased in more severely injured glomeruli. Diabetic nephropathy is associated with glomerular capillary rarefaction. Despite overall increased glomerular VEGF, the decreased receptor-bound VEGF on the endothelium may be an indicator of an insufficient capillary repair reaction.

Modulating IL-6 and IL-10 levels by pharmacologic strategies and the impact of different extracorporeal circulation parameters during cardiac surgery.

Postoperative morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can be influenced by pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines like interleukin 6 (IL-6) and IL-10 triggering and balancing the acute phase response. The extent of cytokine release can be modulated by different methods. This prospective randomized study examines the effect of treatment of patients with steroid (group 1, 250 mg of prednisolone)(Solu-Decortin H)), aprotinin (group 2, 6 Mio. KIU [kallikrein inhibitory units] aprotinin [Trasylol]), and heparine coating of the artificial surface (group 3, Bioline) on the systemic release of IL-6 and IL-10 in four groups of 40 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) scheduled for CABG. Group 4 (standard medication) served as control. Twenty hemodynamic and biochemical parameters of the CPB were analyzed regarding correlation to cytokine levels measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In group 1, IL-6 was suppressed compared to the control (P< 0.01). IL-10 was upregulated (P< 0.01). In group 2, cytokine release was similar to group 1. Using heparin-coated circuits in group 3 led to IL-10 upregulation (P < 0.05) and IL-6 suppression (P < 0.05). We found an exponential relationship between IL-10 levels (IL-6 levels) and cardiac ischemia time, duration of CPB, and the extent of negative base excess. An inverse relationship was found for IL-10 (IL-6) levels and venous O2 saturation (SvO2), and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Hypothermia (<34 degrees C) reduced IL-10 and IL-6 release, whereas long duration of hypothermia correlated with higher IL-10 and IL-6 release. Cytokine release after extracorporeal circulation (ECC) can be modulated pharmacologically and by distinct perfusion regimen.